Development of Research Skills in Educational Continuity: An In-Depth Review of Pedagogical Effectiveness, Student Results, and Strategic Reforms in Kazakhstan
Dana Kuatbayeva
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-1759
Gulshakhan Alimbekova
Kazakh National Women's Pedagogical University. Almaty, Kazakhstan
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-9251
Larissa Lebedeva
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-141X
Aliya Akzholova
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2568-503X
Zhazira Bitibayeva
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3852-7871
Download Full-Text (PDF)

Keywords

educational process
research skills
research culture
future teacher
teacher education
school practice

How to Cite

Kuatbayeva, D., Alimbekova, G., Lebedeva, L., Akzholova, A., & Bitibayeva, Z. (2026). Development of Research Skills in Educational Continuity: An In-Depth Review of Pedagogical Effectiveness, Student Results, and Strategic Reforms in Kazakhstan. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 9(2), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2026.33

Abstract

The development of research competence is a critical mandate for modern teacher education, yet a significant gap persists between theoretical preparation and practical application. This study investigates the formation of research culture among future and practicing teachers in the Republic of Kazakhstan, aiming to identify key components of research competence (motivational, cognitive, operational), diagnose structural barriers, and propose a model for integrating research activities into Initial Teacher Education (ITE). Employing a descriptive mixed-methods design, the study analyzed data from 55 participants, including secondary school teachers and senior pedagogical students in Almaty. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire assessing research attitudes and skill deficits, followed by semi-structured in-depth interviews and task-based assessments to evaluate operational proficiency. Results indicate a bifurcation in skill formation: 47% of respondents reported developing research skills primarily during university coursework, whereas only 30% attributed their development to school practice, highlighting a disconnect in the practicum experience. The primary barriers identified were “inability to process collected data” (a cognitive-methodological deficit), “difficulties with academic literature,” and “lack of time” (a structural barrier). While participants demonstrated high intrinsic interest in research (motivational component), this was frequently undermined by low methodological self-efficacy and insufficient institutional mentorship. The study confirms a “theory-practice gap” in which university-based theoretical training fails to translate effectively into school settings. To address this, a structural model is proposed that integrates specific data-analysis modules and systematic mentoring into the teaching practicum, ensuring that future teachers possess both the motivation and the operational capacity for professional inquiry.

Download Full-Text (PDF)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.