Enacting Inclusive Values through Special Education Management: Integrating the Index for Inclusion within Educational Governance in Indonesia
Amka Amka
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4178-6196
Mirnawati Mirnawati
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-2492
Tenty Jahrina Ramli
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4246-9989
Amanah Amanah
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4942-3732
Cahyani Widya Safitri
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8994-5222
Download Full-Text (PDF)

Keywords

Educational governance
inclusive values
Index for Inclusion
special education management
Tetra Helix
Indonesia

How to Cite

Amka, A., Mirnawati, M., Ramli, T., Amanah, A., & Safitri, C. (2026). Enacting Inclusive Values through Special Education Management: Integrating the Index for Inclusion within Educational Governance in Indonesia. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 9(2), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2026.25

Abstract

This study examines how inclusive values are enacted through special education management by integrating the Index for Inclusion (culture, policy, pedagogy) with a Tetra Helix governance lens. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, survey data from 78 stakeholders across primary, secondary, and special schools in South Kalimantan, Indonesia were analysed, followed by interviews, focus groups, and structured observations. Results show culture rated strongest, while policy and pedagogy were lower and more variable, indicating a culture–implementation gap. Qualitative findings identify uneven capacity-building coverage, weak post-training monitoring, role clarity (including GPK functions), and collaboration routines as key mechanisms shaping routinised support. The study reframes special education management as a governance site where values are translated into operational practice and offers a diagnostic contribution for strengthening alignment in inclusive systems.

Download Full-Text (PDF)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.